Laffin,
that depends on what your interest is in Apiphany, are you wanting to look at the situations vacant or express an interest in utilising the services. Alternatively are you publishing these details in an attempt to harass the individual ?
Whatever you think you are stumbling onto, it's significance or relation to the Madeleine McCann investigation, I can assure you that you are well and truly mistaken. That company is run by a colleague of mine and is purely a technical services company. None of the people at his company would welcome a communication from any of you asking them about their involvement in the Madeleine McCann case, or any threats you would care to issue to them. He does not deserve to be dragged into this nor does his family.
It is not just myself you seem to have a habit for posting personal details about, but others who are completely unrelated to the McCann forums. Is it not a fair statement to make that you will go after absolutely anyone that you see fit and is purely at your discretion. You have posted their family home addresses, posted pictures of their families and of them, on the 3 Arguidos you actively encouraged other members to go to these addresses. Do you not understand that the potential threat of your activities and the obvious distress that these people and their families are put through because of you making their private details public ?
In whatever capacity I am able to respectfully request on behalf of these people and my colleagues, can you please cease all cyber stalking and harassment of members of forums, of my colleagues and the McCann family.
To desist entirely from posting up their personal details, the details of their families and any other private information that you have obtained from legitimate or privileged sources.
I am speaking with web masters of various sites and they have agreed to uphold this right for their members to not be attacked, intimidated or bullied by any other members, including yourself. Any posts that do contravene this policy will be deleted. At present there are only two forums that are not honouring this policy, the New 3 Arguidos website run by [removed] and [removed] and the Missing Madeleine forum run by [removed]. I still request that you do not take advantage of these forums and their lack of appropriate moderation and use them for the specific reasons to attack people.
To advise you, I have bbc'd on this email various interested parties so there is a record that I have formally requested that you stop these activities.
Thank you for your attention in this matter
Update to this email: I have now been advised through a third party that the Missing Madeleine forum as mentioned in the email above will now monitor any posts that attack members of the community or their families in what is called "outing". People who have in the past employed this tactic have done so in an attempt to intimidate and bully other members off the internet.
Additional Update: The site admin over at the New 3 Arguidos website have now confirmed that they also will not tolerate any members or their families personal details being published on the forum and will operate a strict policy of removing any content that falls into this category.
-
|2010-02-05 13:44:51 bonnybraes1Sorry, I don't beleive a word of it. If they are all now running scared - good.
It is way, way too late. They should have thought of this long ago. We've all had to help too many people terrified for their safety, and that of their families, because of that shower. They didn't care then, so don't let's pretend they care now.
All they are concerned about is their own sorrybuts. Too late,
-
|2010-02-06 00:00:39 bonnybraes1My my, the day isn't over and I have been proven right about them yet again.
Thanks for the live feed from the SSSSSSSSSSS Eddie:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
"Well my take on things, something happened for him to do this or try to arrange this. I think (redacted) hit on something when he posted up about (redacted).
I have emailed him and have posted it up on 3a's right to reply. I have got him to remove my name, (redacted)'s name and (redacted) name from that OP.
It is obvious from the comments that (redacted) and (redacted) are not going to play fair, so let him sort them out. Basically I think by mine and ambers agreeing to him and saying we will do the best we can and by us not telling him to go forth and multiply it has backed him into a corner."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Either the admin there are happy to 'out' people or they arent